This follows in the spirit of 7d82c99403f615f6236334e698720bf979959704,
and extends the costing API for compares and selects to provide
information about the operands passed in an analogous manner. This
allows us to model the cost of materializing the vector constant, as
some select-of-constants are significantly more expensive than others
when you account for the cost of materializing the constants involved.
This is a stepping stone towards fixing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109466. A separate SLP patch
will be required to utilize the new API.
This tries to add some costs for the shuffle in a ST3/ST4 instruction,
which are represented in LLVM IR as store(interleaving shuffle). In
order to detect the store, it needs to add a CxtI context instruction to
check the users of the shuffle. LD3 and LD4 are added, LD2 should be a
zip1 shuffle, which will be added in another patch.
It should help fix some of the regressions from #87510.
Currently patchpoints can only have two result types, `void` and `i64`.
This limits the result to general purpose registers.
This patch makes `patchpoint.i64` an overloadable intrinsic, allowing
result values that can fit in a single register (e.g. integers,
pointers, floats).
P9 has vxform `Vector Extract Element Instructions` like `vextuwrx` and
P10 has vxform `Vector Insert Element instructions` like `vinsd`. Update
the instruction cost reflecting these instructions.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50249
There are matching store opcodes (stfd, stxsiwx) for the load opcodes
that make 32-bit and 64-bit vector operations cheap with VSX, so stores
should also be cheap.
It seems TypeSize is currently broken in the sense that:
TypeSize::Fixed(4) + TypeSize::Scalable(4) => TypeSize::Fixed(8)
without failing its assert that explicitly tests for this case:
assert(LHS.Scalable == RHS.Scalable && ...);
The reason this fails is that `Scalable` is a static method of class
TypeSize,
and LHS and RHS are both objects of class TypeSize. So this is
evaluating
if the pointer to the function Scalable == the pointer to the function
Scalable,
which is always true because LHS and RHS have the same class.
This patch fixes the issue by renaming `TypeSize::Scalable` ->
`TypeSize::getScalable`, as well as `TypeSize::Fixed` to
`TypeSize::getFixed`,
so that it no longer clashes with the variable in
FixedOrScalableQuantity.
The new methods now also better match the coding standard, which
specifies that:
* Variable names should be nouns (as they represent state)
* Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions)
Try to avoid some unprofitable predication on PPC. Recognize in the cost model that computing on i1 values will require extra mask or compare operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155876
In order to allow targets to disable interleaving for scalable vectors, pass the entire VF's ElementCount to getMaxInterleaveFactor.
This is based off of the approach used here: 8d36708507
The plan would then be to disable interleaving on scalable VFs on RISC-V in a follow up patch.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D143723#4132349
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144474
LoopUnroll estimates the loop size via getInstructionCost(),
but getInstructionCost() cannot pass CostKind to getVectorInstrCost().
And so does getShuffleCost() to getBroadcastShuffleOverhead(),
getPermuteShuffleOverhead(), getExtractSubvectorOverhead(),
and getInsertSubvectorOverhead().
To address this, this patch adds an argument CostKind to these
functions.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142116
Need to include the cost of the initial insertelement to the cost of the
broadcasts. Also, need to adjust the cost of the gather/buildvector if
the element is inserted into poison/undef vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140498
Dynamic tls access model will be lowered to MI which clobbers CTR in
the loop in ISEL(ADDItlsgdLADDR) and post-isel CTR loop pass will revert
the loop to a normal compare + branch form.
So no need to add this clobber check in hardware loop insertion pass now.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140367
We added a new post-isel CTRLoop pass in D122125. That pass will expand
the hardware loop related intrinsic to CTR loop or normal loop based
on the loop context. So we don't need to conservatively check the CTR
clobber now on the IR level.
Reviewed By: lkail
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135847
There are a few issues with the code we generate for atomic operations and the way we generate it:
- Hard coded CR0 for compares
- Order of operands for compares not conducive to
emitting compare-immediate or for CSE of compares
- Missing MachineMemOperand for st[bhwd]cx intrinsics
- Missing intrinsic properties for the same
- Unnecessary blocks with store conditional
instructions to clear reservation (which ends
up hindering performance)
- Move from CR instructions just to compare the
result of a store conditional with zero (even
though it is a record-form)
This patch aims to resolve all of those issues.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134783
This has the effect of exposing the power-of-two property for use in memory op costing, but no target actually uses it yet. The main point of this change is simple consistency with the recently changes getArithmeticInstrCost, and to remove the last (interface) use of OperandValueKind.
This change completes the process of replacing OperandValueKind and OperandValueProperties which were previously passed independently in this API with a single container class which contains both.
This is the change which motivated the whole sequence which preceeded it. In an original spike version of this change, I'd noticed a nasty bug: I'd changed the signature without changing names, and as result, we silently passed additional information through a callsite which previously dropped the power-of-two fact. This might be harmless in most cases, but at least a couple clearly dependend for correctness on not passing that property through.
I did my best to split off prior changes which reduced the scope of this one, and which made it possible to use compiler assistance. For instance, every parameter which changes type in this change also changes name. This was intentional to make sure that every call site possible effected must show up in the diff. This let me audit each one closely.
Defaults to TCK_RecipThroughput - as most explicit calls were assuming TCK_RecipThroughput (vectorizers) or was just doing a before-vs-after comparison (vectorcombiner). Calls via getInstructionCost were just dropping the CostKind, so again there should be no change at this time (as getShuffleCost and its expansions don't use CostKind yet) - but it will make it easier for us to better account for size/latency shuffle costs in inline/unroll passes in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132287
* Replace getUserCost with getInstructionCost, covering all cost kinds.
* Remove getInstructionLatency, it's not implemented by any backends, and we should fold the functionality into getUserCost (now getInstructionCost) to make it easier for targets to handle the cost kinds with their existing cost callbacks.
Original Patch by @samparker (Sam Parker)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79483
TragetLowering had two last InstructionCost related `getTypeLegalizationCost()`
and `getScalingFactorCost()` members, but all other costs are processed in TTI.
E.g. it is not comfortable to use other TTI members in these two functions
overrided in a target.
Minor refactoring: `getTypeLegalizationCost()` now doesn't need DataLayout
parameter - it was always passed from TTI.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117723
In this patch we replace common code patterns with the use of utility
functions for dealing with profiling metadata. There should be no change
in functionality, as the existing checks should be preserved in all
cases.
Reviewed By: bogner, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128860
In this patch we replace common code patterns with the use of utility
functions for dealing with profiling metadata. There should be no change
in functionality, as the existing checks should be preserved in all
cases.
Reviewed By: bogner, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128860
In some passes we need a valid number of cache line size to do analysis or
transformation, e.g., loop cache analysis and loop date prefetch. However,
for some backend targets, `TTIImpl->getCacheLineSize()` is not implemented
and hence 'TTI.getCacheLineSize()' would just return 0 which eventually might
produce invalid result.
In this patch we add a user-specified opt/llc option for cache line size.
If the option is specified by users we use the value supplied, otherwise we
fall-back to the default value obtained from `TTIImpl->->getCacheLineSize()`.
The powerpc target already has such an option, this patch generalizes
this option to TargetTransformInfo.cpp.
Reviewed By: bmahjour, #loopoptwg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127342
This fixes bug 55463, similar to D78668. This is a temporary fix since
we will switch to post-isel CTR loop determination in the future.
Reviewed By: dim, shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125746
The areFunctionArgsABICompatible() hook currently accepts a list of
pointer arguments, though what we're actually interested in is the
ABI compatibility after these pointer arguments have been converted
into value arguments.
This means that a) the current API is incompatible with opaque
pointers (because it requires inspection of pointee types) and
b) it can only be used in the specific context of ArgPromotion.
I would like to reuse the API when inspecting calls during inlining.
This patch converts it into an areTypesABICompatible() hook, which
accepts a list of types. This makes the method more generally usable,
and compatible with opaque pointers from an API perspective (the
actual usage in ArgPromotion/Attributor is still incompatible,
I'll follow up on that in separate patches).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116031
Commit 150681f increases
cost of producing MMA types (vector pair and quad).
However, it increases the cost for getUserCost() which is
used in unrolling. As a result, loops that contain these
types already (from the user code) cannot be unrolled
(even with the user's unroll pragma). This was an unintended
sideeffect. Reverting that portion of the commit to allow
unrolling such loops.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115424
