af12879146
Fix an issue about module linking with LTO.
When compiling with PIE, the small data limitation needs to be consistent with that in PIC, otherwise there will be linking errors due to conflicting values.
bar.c
```
int bar() { return 1; }
```
foo.c
```
int foo() { return 1; }
```
```
clang --target=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu -flto -c foo.c -o foo.o -fPIE
clang --target=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu -flto -c bar.c -o bar.o -fPIC
clang --target=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu -flto foo.o bar.o -flto -nostdlib -v -fuse-ld=lld
```
```
ld.lld: error: linking module flags 'SmallDataLimit': IDs have conflicting values in 'bar.o' and 'ld-temp.o'
clang-15: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
Use Min instead of Error for conflicting SmallDataLimit.
Authored by: @joshua-arch1
Signed-off-by: xiaojing.zhang <xiaojing.zhang@xcalibyte.com>
Signed-off-by: jianxin.lai <jianxin.lai@xcalibyte.com>
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131230
15 lines
504 B
LLVM
15 lines
504 B
LLVM
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv32 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=RV32 %s
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=RV64 %s
|
|
|
|
@v = dso_local global i32 0, align 4
|
|
@r = dso_local global i64 7, align 8
|
|
|
|
; SmallDataLimit set to 0, so we expect no data will put in sbss and sdata.
|
|
!llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
|
|
!0 = !{i32 8, !"SmallDataLimit", i32 0}
|
|
|
|
; RV32-NOT: .section .sbss
|
|
; RV32-NOT: .section .sdata
|
|
; RV64-NOT: .section .sbss
|
|
; RV64-NOT: .section .sdata
|