llvm-project/mlir/test/Transforms/memref-bound-check.mlir
River Riddle 89bc449cee Standardize the value numbering in the AsmPrinter.
Change the AsmPrinter to number values breadth-first so that values in adjacent regions can have the same name. This allows for ModuleOp to contain operations that produce results. This also standardizes the special name of region entry arguments to "arg[0-9+]" now that Functions are also operations.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 257225069
2019-07-09 10:41:00 -07:00

287 lines
11 KiB
MLIR

// RUN: mlir-opt %s -memref-bound-check -split-input-file -verify-diagnostics | FileCheck %s
// -----
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test() {
func @test() {
%zero = constant 0 : index
%minusone = constant -1 : index
%sym = constant 111 : index
%A = alloc() : memref<9 x 9 x i32>
%B = alloc() : memref<111 x i32>
affine.for %i = -1 to 10 {
affine.for %j = -1 to 10 {
%idx0 = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> (d0)(%i, %j)
%idx1 = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> (d1)(%i, %j)
// Out of bound access.
%x = affine.load %A[%idx0, %idx1] : memref<9 x 9 x i32>
// expected-error@-1 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
// expected-error@-2 {{'affine.load' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension #1}}
// expected-error@-3 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #2}}
// expected-error@-4 {{'affine.load' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension #2}}
// This will access 0 to 110 - hence an overflow.
%idy = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> (10*d0 - d1 + 19)(%i, %j)
%y = affine.load %B[%idy] : memref<111 x i32>
}
}
affine.for %k = 0 to 10 {
// In bound.
%u = affine.load %B[%zero] : memref<111 x i32>
// Out of bounds.
%v = affine.load %B[%sym] : memref<111 x i32> // expected-error {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
// Out of bounds.
affine.store %v, %B[%minusone] : memref<111 x i32> // expected-error {{'affine.store' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension #1}}
}
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test_mod_floordiv_ceildiv
func @test_mod_floordiv_ceildiv() {
%zero = constant 0 : index
%A = alloc() : memref<128 x 64 x 64 x i32>
affine.for %i = 0 to 256 {
affine.for %j = 0 to 256 {
%idx0 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d0 mod 128 + 1)(%i, %j, %j)
%idx1 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d1 floordiv 4 + 1)(%i, %j, %j)
%idx2 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d2 ceildiv 4)(%i, %j, %j)
%x = affine.load %A[%idx0, %idx1, %idx2] : memref<128 x 64 x 64 x i32>
// expected-error@-1 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
// expected-error@-2 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #2}}
// expected-error@-3 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #3}}
%idy0 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d0 mod 128)(%i, %j, %j)
%idy1 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d1 floordiv 4)(%i, %j, %j)
%idy2 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d2 ceildiv 4 - 1)(%i, %j, %j)
affine.store %x, %A[%idy0, %idy1, %idy2] : memref<128 x 64 x 64 x i32> // expected-error {{'affine.store' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension #3}}
} // CHECK }
} // CHECK }
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test_no_out_of_bounds()
func @test_no_out_of_bounds() {
%zero = constant 0 : index
%A = alloc() : memref<257 x 256 x i32>
%C = alloc() : memref<257 x i32>
%B = alloc() : memref<1 x i32>
affine.for %i = 0 to 256 {
affine.for %j = 0 to 256 {
// All of these accesses are in bound; check that no errors are emitted.
// CHECK: %{{.*}} = affine.apply {{#map.*}}(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}})
// CHECK-NEXT: %{{.*}} = affine.load %{{.*}}[%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}] : memref<257x256xi32>
// CHECK-NEXT: %{{.*}} = affine.apply {{#map.*}}(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}})
// CHECK-NEXT: %{{.*}} = affine.load %{{.*}}[%{{.*}}] : memref<1xi32>
%idx0 = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> ( 64 * (d0 ceildiv 64))(%i, %j)
// Without GCDTightenInequalities(), the upper bound on the region
// accessed along first memref dimension would have come out as d0 <= 318
// (instead of d0 <= 256), and led to a false positive out of bounds.
%x = affine.load %A[%idx0, %zero] : memref<257 x 256 x i32>
%idy = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> (d0 floordiv 256)(%i, %i)
%y = affine.load %B[%idy] : memref<1 x i32>
} // CHECK-NEXT }
}
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @mod_div
func @mod_div() {
%zero = constant 0 : index
%A = alloc() : memref<128 x 64 x 64 x i32>
affine.for %i = 0 to 256 {
affine.for %j = 0 to 256 {
%idx0 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d0 mod 128 + 1)(%i, %j, %j)
%idx1 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d1 floordiv 4 + 1)(%i, %j, %j)
%idx2 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d2 ceildiv 4)(%i, %j, %j)
%x = affine.load %A[%idx0, %idx1, %idx2] : memref<128 x 64 x 64 x i32>
// expected-error@-1 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
// expected-error@-2 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #2}}
// expected-error@-3 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #3}}
%idy0 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d0 mod 128)(%i, %j, %j)
%idy1 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d1 floordiv 4)(%i, %j, %j)
%idy2 = affine.apply (d0, d1, d2) -> (d2 ceildiv 4 - 1)(%i, %j, %j)
affine.store %x, %A[%idy0, %idy1, %idy2] : memref<128 x 64 x 64 x i32> // expected-error {{'affine.store' op memref out of lower bound access along dimension #3}}
}
}
return
}
// Tests with nested mod's and floordiv's.
// CHECK-LABEL: func @mod_floordiv_nested() {
func @mod_floordiv_nested() {
%A = alloc() : memref<256 x 256 x i32>
affine.for %i = 0 to 256 {
affine.for %j = 0 to 256 {
%idx0 = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> ((d0 mod 1024) floordiv 4)(%i, %j)
%idx1 = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> ((((d1 mod 128) mod 32) ceildiv 4) * 32)(%i, %j)
affine.load %A[%idx0, %idx1] : memref<256 x 256 x i32> // expected-error {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #2}}
}
}
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test_semi_affine_bailout
func @test_semi_affine_bailout(%N : index) {
%B = alloc() : memref<10 x i32>
affine.for %i = 0 to 10 {
%idx = affine.apply (d0)[s0] -> (d0 * s0)(%i)[%N]
%y = affine.load %B[%idx] : memref<10 x i32>
// expected-error@-1 {{getMemRefRegion: compose affine map failed}}
}
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @multi_mod_floordiv
func @multi_mod_floordiv() {
%A = alloc() : memref<2x2xi32>
affine.for %ii = 0 to 64 {
%idx0 = affine.apply (d0) -> ((d0 mod 147456) floordiv 1152) (%ii)
%idx1 = affine.apply (d0) -> (((d0 mod 147456) mod 1152) floordiv 384) (%ii)
%v = affine.load %A[%idx0, %idx1] : memref<2x2xi32>
}
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @delinearize_mod_floordiv
func @delinearize_mod_floordiv() {
%c0 = constant 0 : index
%in = alloc() : memref<2x2x3x3x16x1xi32>
%out = alloc() : memref<64x9xi32>
// Reshape '%in' into '%out'.
affine.for %ii = 0 to 64 {
affine.for %jj = 0 to 9 {
%a0 = affine.apply (d0, d1) -> (d0 * (9 * 1024) + d1 * 128) (%ii, %jj)
%a10 = affine.apply (d0) ->
(d0 floordiv (2 * 3 * 3 * 128 * 128)) (%a0)
%a11 = affine.apply (d0) ->
((d0 mod 294912) floordiv (3 * 3 * 128 * 128)) (%a0)
%a12 = affine.apply (d0) ->
((((d0 mod 294912) mod 147456) floordiv 1152) floordiv 8) (%a0)
%a13 = affine.apply (d0) ->
((((d0 mod 294912) mod 147456) mod 1152) floordiv 384) (%a0)
%a14 = affine.apply (d0) ->
(((((d0 mod 294912) mod 147456) mod 1152) mod 384) floordiv 128) (%a0)
%a15 = affine.apply (d0) ->
((((((d0 mod 294912) mod 147456) mod 1152) mod 384) mod 128)
floordiv 128) (%a0)
%v0 = affine.load %in[%a10, %a11, %a13, %a14, %a12, %a15]
: memref<2x2x3x3x16x1xi32>
}
}
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @zero_d_memref
func @zero_d_memref(%arg0: memref<i32>) {
%c0 = constant 0 : i32
// A 0-d memref always has in-bound accesses!
affine.store %c0, %arg0[] : memref<i32>
return
}
// CHECK-LABEL: func @out_of_bounds
func @out_of_bounds() {
%in = alloc() : memref<1xi32>
%c9 = constant 9 : i32
affine.for %i0 = 10 to 11 {
%idy = affine.apply (d0) -> (100 * d0 floordiv 1000) (%i0)
affine.store %c9, %in[%idy] : memref<1xi32> // expected-error {{'affine.store' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
}
return
}
// -----
// This test case accesses within bounds. Without removal of a certain type of
// trivially redundant constraints (those differing only in their constant
// term), the number of constraints here explodes, and this would return out of
// bounds errors conservatively due to FlatAffineConstraints::kExplosionFactor.
#map3 = (d0, d1) -> ((d0 * 72 + d1) floordiv 2304 + ((((d0 * 72 + d1) mod 2304) mod 1152) mod 9) floordiv 3)
#map4 = (d0, d1) -> ((d0 * 72 + d1) mod 2304 - (((d0 * 72 + d1) mod 2304) floordiv 1152) * 1151 - ((((d0 * 72 + d1) mod 2304) mod 1152) floordiv 9) * 9 - (((((d0 * 72 + d1) mod 2304) mod 1152) mod 9) floordiv 3) * 3)
#map5 = (d0, d1) -> (((((d0 * 72 + d1) mod 2304) mod 1152) floordiv 9) floordiv 8)
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test_complex_mod_floordiv
func @test_complex_mod_floordiv(%arg0: memref<4x4x16x1xf32>) {
%c0 = constant 0 : index
%0 = alloc() : memref<1x2x3x3x16x1xf32>
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 64 {
affine.for %i1 = 0 to 9 {
%2 = affine.apply #map3(%i0, %i1)
%3 = affine.apply #map4(%i0, %i1)
%4 = affine.apply #map5(%i0, %i1)
%5 = affine.load %arg0[%2, %c0, %4, %c0] : memref<4x4x16x1xf32>
}
}
return
}
// -----
// The first load is within bounds, but not the second one.
#map0 = (d0) -> (d0 mod 4)
#map1 = (d0) -> (d0 mod 4 + 4)
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test_mod_bound
func @test_mod_bound() {
%0 = alloc() : memref<7 x f32>
%1 = alloc() : memref<6 x f32>
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 4096 {
affine.for %i1 = #map0(%i0) to #map1(%i0) {
affine.load %0[%i1] : memref<7 x f32>
affine.load %1[%i1] : memref<6 x f32>
// expected-error@-1 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
}
}
return
}
// -----
#map0 = (d0) -> (d0 floordiv 4)
#map1 = (d0) -> (d0 floordiv 4 + 4)
#map2 = (d0) -> (4 * (d0 floordiv 4) + d0 mod 4)
// CHECK-LABEL: func @test_floordiv_bound
func @test_floordiv_bound() {
%0 = alloc() : memref<1027 x f32>
%1 = alloc() : memref<1026 x f32>
%2 = alloc() : memref<4096 x f32>
%N = constant 2048 : index
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 4096 {
affine.for %i1 = #map0(%i0) to #map1(%i0) {
affine.load %0[%i1] : memref<1027 x f32>
affine.load %1[%i1] : memref<1026 x f32>
// expected-error@-1 {{'affine.load' op memref out of upper bound access along dimension #1}}
}
affine.for %i2 = 0 to #map2(%N) {
// Within bounds.
%v = affine.load %2[%i2] : memref<4096 x f32>
}
}
return
}
// -----
// This should not give an out of bounds error. The result of the affine.apply
// is composed into the bound map during analysis.
#map_lb = (d0) -> (d0)
#map_ub = (d0) -> (d0 + 4)
// CHECK-LABEL: func @non_composed_bound_operand
func @non_composed_bound_operand(%arg0: memref<1024xf32>) {
affine.for %i0 = 4 to 1028 step 4 {
%i1 = affine.apply (d0) -> (d0 - 4) (%i0)
affine.for %i2 = #map_lb(%i1) to #map_ub(%i1) {
%0 = affine.load %arg0[%i2] : memref<1024xf32>
}
}
return
}