We reassociate ((x && y) && z) -> (x && (y && z)) if x has more than
use, in order to allow simplifying the header mask further. However this
is somewhat unreliable as there are times when it doesn't have more than
one use, e.g. see the case we run into in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/173265/changes#r2769759907.
This moves it into a separate transformation that always reassociates
the header mask regardless of the number of uses, which prevents some
fragile test changes in #173265.
We need to run it before both calls to simplifyRecipes in optimize. I
considered putting it in simplifyRecipes itself but simplifyRecipes is
also called after unrolling and when the loop region is dissolved which
causes vputils::findHeaderMask to assert.
There isn't really any benefit to reassociating masks that aren't the
header mask so the existing simplification was removed.