ad4a582fd9
Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to get reliable results across targets. Note: I don't have commit access.
42 lines
1.3 KiB
LLVM
42 lines
1.3 KiB
LLVM
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple ve | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=CHECK
|
|
|
|
declare dso_local void @main()
|
|
|
|
define dso_local void @naked() naked "frame-pointer"="all" {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: naked:
|
|
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lea %s0, main@lo
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: and %s0, %s0, (32)0
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lea.sl %s12, main@hi(, %s0)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: bsic %s10, (, %s12)
|
|
call void @main()
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define dso_local void @normal() "frame-pointer"="all" {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: normal:
|
|
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: st %s9, (, %s11)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: st %s10, 8(, %s11)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: or %s9, 0, %s11
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lea %s11, -240(, %s11)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: brge.l.t %s11, %s8, .LBB1_2
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.1:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ld %s61, 24(, %s14)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: or %s62, 0, %s0
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lea %s63, 315
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: shm.l %s63, (%s61)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: shm.l %s8, 8(%s61)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: shm.l %s11, 16(%s61)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: monc
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: or %s0, 0, %s62
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB1_2:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lea %s0, main@lo
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: and %s0, %s0, (32)0
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lea.sl %s12, main@hi(, %s0)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: bsic %s10, (, %s12)
|
|
call void @main()
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|