When lowering fixed length vector operations for SVE the subvector
operations are used extensively to marshall data between scalable
and fixed-length vectors. This means that sequences like:
extract_subvec(binop(insert_subvec(a), insert_subvec(b)))
are very common. DAGCombine only checks if the resulting binop is
legal or can be custom lowered when undoing such sequences. When
it's custom lowering that is introducing them the result is an
infinite legalise->combine->legalise loop.
This patch extends the isOperationLegalOr... functions to include
a "LegalOnly" parameter to restrict the check to legal operations
only. Although isOperationLegal could be used it's common for
the affected code paths to be visited pre and post legalisation,
so the extra parameter keeps the code tidy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86450
The addend in a REL32 reloc needs to be adjusted to account for the
offset from the PC value returned by the s_getpc instruction to the
point where the reloc is applied. This was being done correctly for
(GOTPC)REL32_LO but not for (GOTPC)REL32_HI. This will only make a
difference if the target symbol happens to get loaded almost exactly
a multiple of 4G away from the relocated instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86938
Unwinders may only preserve the lower 64bits of Neon and SVE registers,
as only the registers in the base ABI are guaranteed to be preserved
over the exception edge. The caller will need to preserve additional
registers for when the call throws an exception and the unwinder has
tried to recover state.
For e.g.
svint32_t bar(svint32_t);
svint32_t foo(svint32_t x, bool *err) {
try { bar(x); } catch (...) { *err = true; }
return x;
}
`z0` needs to be spilled before the call to `bar(x)` and reloaded before
returning from foo, as the exception handler may have clobbered z0.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84737
This patch uses partial DemandedElts masks to further simplify target shuffle chains and finally starts making target shuffle combining part of SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.
We already manage this for Depth == 0 cases, where combineX86ShuffleChain would early-out if the shuffle combined to the same op, but the patch generalizes this by manipulating the depth handling of combineX86ShufflesRecursively - calling with a new Depth = 0 and reducing the maximum shuffle combine depth accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66004
Summary:
Analyses are preserved in MemCpyOptimizer.
Get analyses before running the pass and store the pointers, instead of
using lambdas and getting them every time on demand.
Reviewers: lenary, deadalnix, mehdi_amini, nikic, efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74494
Previously if the source match we asserted that the destination
matched. But GPR <-> mask register copies on X86 can violate this
since we use the same K-registers for multiple sizes.
Fixes this ISPC issue https://github.com/ispc/ispc/issues/1851
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86507
This reverts commit bc9a29b9ee6ade4894252b1470977142c32b4602.
The reasoning that this patch was wrong was itself incorrect
(see discussion on llvm-commits). This patch does seem to be exposing
a latent SVE code generation bug on non-public tests, which should
not block a correctness fix for public, non-SVE use cases.
General purpose registers 30 and 31 are handled differently when they are
reserved as the base-pointer and frame-pointer respectively. This fixes the
offset of their fixed-stack objects when there are fpr calle-saved registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85850
This is needed for an upcoming change to how we translate conditional branches
which might generate these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86383
On -O0, i1 strict_fsetcc will be promoted to i32. We don't handle that
in TD patterns. This patch fills logic in PPCISelDAGToDAG to handle more
cases.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86595
This reverts commit e9d9a612084b47fc4277523561d61e675370c854.
This patch was previously revert by 04879086b44348cad600a0a1ccbe1f7776cc3cf9
with the reapplication being done after breaking the assert used to
ensure SP is always 16-byte aligned, which is a requirement of the AAPCS.
For extra context the latest patch caused runtime failures when
building with "-march=armv8-a+sve -mllvm -aarch64-sve-vector-bits-min=256".
Unmerges have the same fundamental problem as G_TRUNC, and G_TRUNC
could be implemented in terms of G_UNMERGE_VALUES. Reducing the number
of elements in unmerge results ends up producing the original unmerge
type profile, so the artifact combiner needs to eliminate the
intermediate illegal registers. This avoids infinite looping in the
legalizer in a future change.
Assuming an unmerge has each result unmerged the same way, this ends
up producing a new unmerge of the source for every definition. I'm not
sure if the artifact combiner should either insert temporary merges
here and erase the original merge, or if the combiner should look at
uses from defs rather than defs from uses for unmerges.
In a few cases this regresses from using 16-bit shifts for 8-bit
values to using 32-bit shifts, but I think these can be legalized
later (the other legalization rules don't try very hard to use 16-bit
shifts either).
Currently the dbg_value ends up in the relaxed branch block. A future
commit will push the dbg_value out of this block, and I'm not sure how
to coax the IR into producing the same MIR at the relevant point.
I have fixed up a number of warnings resulting from TypeSize -> uint64_t
casts and calling getVectorNumElements() on scalable vector types. I
think most of the changes are fairly trivial except for those in
DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_MLOAD I've tried to ensure we create
the MachineMemoryOperands in a sensible way for scalable vectors.
I have added a CHECK line to the following test:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-split-load.ll
that ensures no new warnings are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86697
This patch implements the foldMemoryOperand hook in Thumb1InstrInfo,
allowing tBLXr and a spilled function address to be combined back into a
tBL. This can help with codesize at Oz, especailly in the tinycrypt
library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79785
I tried to fix this in:
rG716e35a0cf53
...but that patch depends on the order that we encounter the
magic "x/sqrt(x)" expression in the combiner's worklist.
This patch should improve that by waiting until we walk the
user list to decide if there's a use to skip.
The AArch64 test reveals another (existing) ordering problem
though - we may try to create an estimate for plain sqrt(x)
before we see that it is part of a 1/sqrt(x) expression.
For an instruction in the basic block BB, SinkingPass enumerates basic blocks
dominated by BB and BB's successors. For each enumerated basic block,
SinkingPass uses `AllUsesDominatedByBlock` to check whether the basic
block dominates all of the instruction's users. This is inefficient.
Use the nearest common dominator of all users to avoid enumerating the
candidate. The nearest common dominator may be in a parent loop which is
not beneficial. In that case, find the ancestors in the dominator tree.
In the case that the instruction has no user, with this change we will
not perform unnecessary move. This causes some amdgpu test changes.
A stage-2 x86-64 clang is a byte identical with this change.
In general, we probably want to try the multi-use reciprocal
transform before sqrt transforms, but x/sqrt(x) is a special-case
because that will always reduce to plain sqrt(x) or an estimate.
The AArch64 tests show that the transform is limited by TLI
hook to patterns where there are 3 or more uses of the divisor.
So this change can result in an extra division compared to
what we had, but that's the intended behvior based on the
current setting of that hook.
Perfect shuffle instruction (vdealvdd/vshuffvdd) work on vector
pairs. When given a single input vector, half of it first needs
to be transposed into the other vector before the generated
shuffles can take effect. Also the first transpose needs to be
undone at the end (this last step was missing).
Otherwise their alignment is dependent on the size of the section. If the size
is large than 16, the alignment will be 16.
16 is a bad choice for both .llvmbc and .llvmcmd because the padding between two
contributions from input sections is of a variable size.
A bitstream is actually guaranteed to be 4-byte aligned, but consumers don't
need this property.
This ensures that you get the same output regardless if generating
code directly to an object file or if generating assembly and
assembling that.
Add implementations of the EmitARM64WinCFI*() methods in
AArch64TargetAsmStreamer, and fill in one blank in MCAsmStreamer.
Add corresponding directive handlers in AArch64AsmParser and
COFFAsmParser.
Some SEH directive names have been picked to match the prior art
for SEH assembly directives for x86_64, e.g. the spelling of
".seh_startepilogue" matching the preexisting ".seh_endprologue".
For the directives for saving registers, the exact spelling
from the arm64 documentation is picked, e.g. ".seh_save_reg" (to follow
that naming for all the other ones, e.g. ".seh_save_fregp_x"), while
the corresponding one for x86_64 is plain ".seh_savereg" without the
second underscore.
Directives in the epilogues have the same names as in prologues,
e.g. .seh_savereg, even though the registers are restored, not
saved, at that point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86529
Current `v:t = zext(setcc x,y,cc)` will be transformed to `select x, y, 1:t, 0:t, cc`. It misses some opportunities if x's type size is less than `t`'s size. This patch enhances the above transformation.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86687
The implicit def of the super register would appear to kill any live
uses of components before the spill, and would be deleted by
MachineCopyPropagation. We need to add implicit uses of the super
register, similarly to what copyPhysReg does. VGPR tuples appear to be
correctly handled already. I need to double check the SGPR->memory
path.
