Vikram Hegde 402ee51532
[AMDGPU] Fix DomTree preservation in SILowerControlFlow when nodes are removed (#176691)
I would think the "applyUpdates" API should also take care of deleting
the nodes from the analyses objects but this does not seem to be the
case. https://godbolt.org/z/38a7rfzjd shows an example where
SILowerControlFlow removes a basic block which is not removed in the
Post dominator tree.
2026-01-25 09:45:44 +05:30
..
2025-12-05 12:39:50 +00:00
2025-12-05 12:39:50 +00:00
2025-12-05 12:39:50 +00:00

+==============================================================================+
| How to organize the lit tests                                                |
+==============================================================================+

- If you write a test for matching a single DAG opcode or intrinsic, it should
  go in a file called {opcode_name,intrinsic_name}.ll (e.g. fadd.ll)

- If you write a test that matches several DAG opcodes and checks for a single
  ISA instruction, then that test should go in a file called {ISA_name}.ll (e.g.
  bfi_int.ll

- For all other tests, use your best judgement for organizing tests and naming
  the files.

+==============================================================================+
| Naming conventions                                                           |
+==============================================================================+

- Use dash '-' and not underscore '_' to separate words in file names, unless
  the file is named after a DAG opcode or ISA instruction that has an
  underscore '_' in its name.